OpenGL ? Re: gcc 3.3.1: include problem solved

[Brian Ford]

These questions are mainly directed at Andre Bleau (Cygwin's OpenGL
maintainer).

I am glad that the ambiguity in gcc include search paths has been
resolved.  However, the OpenGL includes in w32api/GL are from Mesa, and
are thus more complete and up-to-date.

What are the long term plans, if any, for reconciling these two
implementations?  It seems silly to have two copies of esstially the same
thing.

Are there any plans to update Cygwin's OpenGL headers to include 1.3 or
1.4 support?  Be it via using the w32api Mesa ones, or by other means.

Are there any plans to update Cygwin's glut to the current Nate Robins
version?

Thanks.

BTW, I'm more than willing to help here.  But since your the maintainer, I
need to know how you want to proceed.

-- 
Brian Ford
Senior Realtime Software Engineer
VITAL - Visual Simulation Systems
FlightSafety International
Phone: 314-551-8460
Fax:   314-551-8444

--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/