Binaries compiled with GCC 3.2-3 much bigger than with 2.95.3-10?
Fri Sep 5 11:19:00 GMT 2003
There have been discussions on various forums about increased
executable size and in particular, compile time, pretty much
since gcc-3.1 was in beta. Exe will be bigger than 2-95, even
You can get more context on this at the gcc lists:
For many folks I work with, the biggest size adder is iostream..
Of course, most of them are worried about "Hello World".
Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html
More information about the Cygwin