Binaries compiled with GCC 3.2-3 much bigger than with 2.95.3-10 ?
Lapo Luchini
lapo@lapo.it
Fri Sep 5 08:14:00 GMT 2003
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Frédéric L. W. Meunier wrote:
| I just switched to 3.2-3 and was impressed with the following:
|
| Cygwin -O2 -O2 + -Wl,-s -Os -Os + -Wl,-s What's so
| different in 3.2-3 ? On Linux GCC 3.x produced smaller binaries. On
| Cygwin the size doubled.
Did you "strip" the executable produced?
AFAIK gcc3 has much more "debug" infos, but once stripped should be of a
similiar size.
- --
Lapo 'Raist' Luchini
lapo@lapo.it (PGP & X.509 keys available)
http://www.lapo.it (ICQ UIN: 529796)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.2 (Cygwin)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
iEYEARECAAYFAj9YRd8ACgkQaJiCLMjyUvt4+gCaAtOxJWOh53VQGlrqHR5C5Q50
GwUAnjf1hIJbE94w7QUyg9JVCNrE29Eg
=jR8F
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--
Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/
More information about the Cygwin
mailing list