cc1plus.exe not included in GCC 3.3.1-3?

[Robert Collins]

On Fri, 2003-11-14 at 09:26, Brian Ford wrote:
> > Setup will do per-version dependencies, but it does so *for the target
> > version*.
> >
> I didn't think version specific dependencies would be needed here.  I'm
> obviously not well versed in setup, but I thought that replacing the old
> monolithic gcc package with an empty one and ajdusting that empty one's
> dependencies to require the new equivalent packages would have done the
> trick.  I guess I was wrong here?

No, that will work. I'd say that hasn't been done though.

Rob

-- 
GPG key available at: <http://members.aardvark.net.au/lifeless/keys.txt>.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
URL: <http://cygwin.com/pipermail/cygwin/attachments/20031113/aa31367e/attachment.sig>