RPM support (was Re: qmail port successfull)

Martin Gainty mgainty@hotmail.com
Fri May 30 07:49:00 GMT 2003


+1 for ant support
Now that ant has support for cc I dont see the use for archaic makefiles
Martin
----- Original Message -----
From: "Dario Alcocer" <alcocer@helixdigital.com>
To: <cygwin@cygwin.com>
Sent: Thursday, May 29, 2003 6:35 PM
Subject: RPM support (was Re: qmail port successfull)


> On Thu, May 29, 2003 at 11:28:14AM -0400, Igor Pechtchanski wrote:
> > On Thu, 29 May 2003, Lapo Luchini wrote:
> > > This reminds me that maybe it could be cool to have an "install"
option
> > > in "type 2 packages" that installs them directly, without bothering to
> > > have a "fake" local setup.ini, starting setup, let it install the
> > > package... this would need some command line "installed package db"
> > > management of some kind. Or it is already out there, only I didn't
> > > notice it?
> >
> > Isn't that what the RPM port eventually hopes to accomplish? ;-)
>
> Yes, at least those are /my/ plans. FWIW, I hoping to use apt-rpm.
>
> --
> Dario Alcocer -- Sr. Software Developer, Helix Digital Inc.
> alcocer@helixdigital.com -- http://www.helixdigital.com
>
> --
> Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
> Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
> Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
> FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/
>
>

--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/



More information about the Cygwin mailing list