SPARSE files considered harmful - please revert
John Vincent
jpv50@hotmail.com
Mon May 19 19:40:00 GMT 2003
You say that any areas that are seeked over should be sparse as well. That
is true on many Unix/Linux file systems. I've not seen anything to suggest
it's true on NTFS though, have you?
From: "Max Bowsher" <maxb at ukf dot net>
To: <cygwin at cygwin dot com>
Date: Mon, 19 May 2003 19:54:19 +0100
Subject: Re: SPARSE files considered harmful - please revert
References: <Law10-F79o4cWScPAA600033a95@hotmail.com>
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
John Vincent wrote:
>
>I looked up sparse files on MSDN and found the following link:
>
>
http://msdn.microsoft.com/library/default.asp?url=/library/en-us/fileio/base/sparse_file_operations.asp
>
>The most interesting thing is that a sparse file is only sparse if the
zeros
>in the file are written with a special operation. I strongly suspect that
>the patch to support sparse files introduced in cygwin is incorrect (or at
>least incomplete)
Areas that are simply seeked over, and never written to, should be sparse as
well.
Anyway:
Based on the posted numbers, global use of sparse files is a bad idea. Can
we conditionalize sparse files on a $CYGWIN option? (Or something else, I
don't mind, but the important thing is that it should not be on by default.)
_________________________________________________________________
It's fast, it's easy and it's free. Get MSN Messenger today!
http://www.msn.co.uk/messenger
--
Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/
More information about the Cygwin
mailing list