Please try the latest snapshot -- it is close to cygwin 1.5.6

[Philippe Torche]

Christopher Faylor wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 26, 2003 at 05:37:36PM +0100, Philippe Torche wrote:
> 
>>Christopher Faylor wrote:
>>
>>>The subject says it all.
>>>
>>>I'm hoping to release cygwin 1.5.6 shortly after Christmas.
>>
>>I've tested it (CVS version 12:35 GMT + 1) on our 4 Xeon on W2003S and 
>>unfortunately my previous test case (run_t.sh and t.sh) always fails. 
I've replace bash with sh and no problem anymore (not have wait enough 
maybe) ! A bash bug ?
> 
> 
> Let me be extremely clear about this again: I don't have a 4 Xeon
> processor running W2003S.  I will not be able to test this and I,
> frankly, don't care much about this corner case -- especially if it is
> not a regression from previous releases.
> 
> So, if you were just reporting this as a data point, then thanks.  If
> you are expecting me to do something about it, then, you will,
> unfortunately, be disappointed.
:-( Not you but other maybe ! If you show old threads, I'm not alone 
with this problem ! I can't give access to a multi CPU computer (client 
machine), but maybe somebody can ?
> 
> 
>>The test suite runs soon happily (except now 3 cases) with my Athlon on 
>>WinXP, and I'm preparing to run it tomorrow on our 4 Xeon.
:-) The test case give me the same result
> 
> 
> I think I will have to give a gold star to the person who figures out
> why those three cases are "failing".  It really isn't that hard.
> 


--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/