Cygwin survey: Next vim version with perl support?
Vince Hoffman
Vince.Hoffman@uk.circle.com
Wed Apr 30 11:53:00 GMT 2003
>
> Well... when writing my survey mail I was actually mulling over an
> additional sentence like "Note that I'll maintain only one package."
> but dropped it for the final mail. I should have known better.
>
> The problem with vim is the number of configure options which do make
> different sense for different people. What should I do?
>
> - pure vim
> - perl support
> - python support
> - tcl support
> - ruby support
> - perl and python but not tcl
> - gvim with win32 interface (actually unsupported under Cygwin)
> - gvim with X interface
> - Which X interface, gtk, gnome, motif, athena?
> - ...
>
> See what I mean? You'd never hit the right combination. I've just
> checked the vim release on my Linux box and found out that it's also
> not built with any of the interpreter language support. Of course
> I'm using my own handcrafted build of vim...
>
>
> Corinna
>
Corrinna,
Sorry about that. I regretted the suggestion as soon as I suggested
it as it should be easy enough to build your own vim if you require more
advanced features, and you're already doing plenty without creating another
package. I think I'd change my vote to no on second thoughts since
installing perl just to use vi is a little over the top.
Vince
--
Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/
More information about the Cygwin
mailing list