bug with setup.exe: saw tetex-beta even though I did not select prev

[Robert Collins]

On Wed, 2003-04-09 at 03:57, Jan Nieuwenhuizen wrote:


> Setup does not have a `conflicts:' afaik, but I don't see how that
> should help?  The new packages should get installed automagically
> through the new `requires:' fields for the old packages.

We have conflicts and replaces in setup.ini *now*, but we don't do
anything with them.

Patches gratefully.... 

Anyway, I still don't see what went wrong - the user selected tetex, and
got tetex. tetex-beta wasn't installed, and shouldn't have been.

Rob
-- 
GPG key available at: <http://users.bigpond.net.au/robertc/keys.txt>.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
URL: <http://cygwin.com/pipermail/cygwin/attachments/20030408/a4a061a5/attachment.sig>