gcc 3

[Michael D. Crawford]

That's good to know, some of what I want to use it for is C++.

But how is it for generating correct code?  Does the machine code correspond 
accurately to what the source requested?

I suppose I can test myself, but one of the things I'd like to do with it is 
build processor-optimized glibc's for my Linux systems.  It would be a drag if 
the code was incorrect.

Mike
---
I have been looking at the C++ compiler only - and it is much
better/stricter with respect to ANSI.

gcc 3.1 is certainly the one I would be looking for.

-- 
Michael D. Crawford
GoingWare Inc. - Expert Software Development and Consulting
http://www.goingware.com/
crawford@goingware.com

  Subscribe to the GoingWare Newsletter at http://www.goingware.com/newsletter/

     Tilting at Windmills for a Better Tomorrow.


--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Bug reporting:         http://cygwin.com/bugs.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/