Binutil compatibulity

Sava Zxivanovich sava.zxivanovich@crsltd.com
Thu Jan 24 08:05:00 GMT 2002


Thanks.

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Corinna Vinschen [mailto:cygwin@cygwin.com]
> Sent: 24 January 2002 15:45
> To: Sava Zxivanovich
> Cc: 'cygwin@cygwin.com'
> Subject: Re: Binutil compatibulity
> 
> 
> On Thu, Jan 24, 2002 at 03:34:56PM -0000, Sava Zxivanovich wrote:
> > Hi.
> > 
> > I am working with PowerPC 401 D2 - in deed PLX IOP480.
> > 
> > I have installed GCC chain that uses binutil 2.9.1, gcc 2.95.2 for
> > powerpc-elf.
> > Due to fact that as in that version do not support one 
> operand - tlbwe,
> > I have to upgrade to one I hope does support - 2.10.1. I 
> would not like
> > to use 2.11, I had quit a bad time with it (and GCC 3.0.1).
> > 
> > My question is if binutil 2.10 does support operand tlwbe (PowerPC
> > Embedded Environment, PowerPC 401D2), would there be any 
> problem if I
> > configure binutils as ppc-eabi (I suppose yes, I would like just to
> > check that) and would it be any problem with gcc 2.95.2 (I 
> suppose not,
> > but you never know).
> > 
> > Why am I asking all this? Well, we are very near to a point where we
> > would go with commercial compiler. Actually, this is a last 
> cry before
> > that.
> 
> Wrong mailing list.
> 
> You should try binutils@sources.redhat.com
> 
> Corinna
> 
> -- 
> Corinna Vinschen                  Please, send mails 
> regarding Cygwin to
> Cygwin Developer                                
> mailto:cygwin@cygwin.com
> Red Hat, Inc.
> 

--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Bug reporting:         http://cygwin.com/bugs.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/



More information about the Cygwin mailing list