[FAQ?] Re: [Mingw-users] Cygwin Full download in one big archive ?
Robert Collins
rbcollins@cygwin.com
Thu Dec 5 15:55:00 GMT 2002
On Fri, 2002-12-06 at 10:30, Charles Wilson wrote:
>
> > Seems pretty clear to me, that for anyone on a slow link, or anyone
> > charged by volume, that the modular install is much more efficient.
>
> Faulty analogy. Most users would probably only download the monolithic
> tarball once, for their initial installation. Then use setup.exe and
> update things in a modular fashion after that.
I'm not about to actively maintain two forms of setup that are so
different. And until someone offers to do that, I think it is a
reasonable assumption to make that the install form you start with you
continue with.
Also, I supported having a 'install-in-one-hit-everything' in setup
earlier in my email, where you did not quote.
Now, for grabbing everything at once, there are many ways:
wget ~= setup ~= winwget ~= ftp mget ~= tool foo
and they are *all* orthogonal to the monolithic download discussion.
I'm trying to highlight the weakness's with a monolithic download, not
the pros and cons of a full-install strategy.
Rob
--
---
GPG key available at: http://users.bigpond.net.au/robertc/keys.txt.
---
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
URL: <http://cygwin.com/pipermail/cygwin/attachments/20021205/46441244/attachment.sig>
More information about the Cygwin
mailing list