Copy-on-write fork

Gary R. Van Sickle
Fri Apr 19 19:58:00 GMT 2002

cgf wrote:

> I assume that one possible reason is that the copy-on-write fork may be
> somehow bypassing normal in-memory sharing of text segments but I never
> knew for sure.

Have either of you tried this comparison on XP, to see if it's any different
there?  I'm running XP here, if Chris J. wants to put the c-o-w DLL up somewhere
so I can download it and try it.

Gary R. Van Sickle
Brewer.  Patriot.

Unsubscribe info:
Bug reporting:

More information about the Cygwin mailing list