Questionable inclusion of ghostscript in setup.exe?
Andreas Eibach
a.eibach@gmx.net
Wed May 2 10:51:00 GMT 2001
----- Original Message -----
From: "Larry Hall (RFK Partners, Inc)" <lhall@rfk.com>
To: "Andreas Eibach" <a.eibach@gmx.net>; <cygwin@cygwin.com>
Sent: Tuesday, May 01, 2001 7:09 PM
Subject: Re: Questionable inclusion of ghostscript in setup.exe?
> At 01:05 PM 5/1/2001, Andreas Eibach wrote:
> >I suggest to either include a _non-X_ version or omit it because "the way
it
> >comes", it's unusable for people who don't have X.
> >
> >Andreas
>
>
>
> I believe this issue has been discussed.
You are right, Larry, and I know it has been discussed. But I couldn't make
out any agreement towards a definite direction from these thread(s) yet, so
I chose to keep this topic from being forgotten.
> I believe the direction is to include a non-X version.
I hope they will.
Andreas
--
Want to unsubscribe from this list?
Check out: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
More information about the Cygwin
mailing list