Cygwin: Open or Closed System? (was: two problems with cygwin's zip)
Wed Jun 27 10:11:00 GMT 2001
On Wed, Jun 27, 2001 at 10:28:47AM -0500, B. K. Oxley (binkley) wrote:
>From: "Fred T. Hamster" <firstname.lastname@example.org>
>>i for one cannot accept the rationale being promulgated that a system
>>for unix emulation on win32 should be ignorant of the native platform's
>>path specification, when calling into the environment from windows is
>>clearly a desirable capability. to me, that rationale seems to
>It would also be nice to see more said of other alternatives, such as
>UWIN, and how the compare with Cygwin. I'm sure they have good ideas
>we can reuse, just as Cygwin has good ideas they can reuse.
Yep. I think that this is a good idea. It would be nice to hear how
other packages handle this.
Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Bug reporting: http://cygwin.com/bugs.html
More information about the Cygwin