pthreads works, sorta
Eric M. Monsler
Wed Jun 27 08:58:00 GMT 2001
Steve Jorgensen wrote:
> OK, I'm over my head to even try to participate in this, but it seems to me
> that if you want to check for the condition where you can neither read nor
I think that the check is for the condition that "one can both read and
write", before proceeding. The IsBad logic forces a somewhat reversed
logical structure, i.e. "if not both read and write, fail", which is
coder-optimised to "if not write, fail", since if we can't read we also
Read-only is failure, as is a NULL, or any other bad pointer.
Assuming I've understood the previous discussions correctly...
Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Bug reporting: http://cygwin.com/bugs.html
More information about the Cygwin