Thu Jun 7 17:06:00 GMT 2001
For me 255 was enough ;-)
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Robert Collins [ mailto:email@example.com ]
> Sent: Thursday, June 07, 2001 8:04 PM
> To: Suhaib Siddiqi; firstname.lastname@example.org
> Subject: Re: sysconf(_SC_OPEN_MAX) limit
> I think it's newlib that provides sysconf....
> I'll see if I have time this weekend to dig into where the 32 is coming
> from. 8192 /16384 sound good for the value returned?
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Suhaib Siddiqi" <email@example.com>
> To: <firstname.lastname@example.org>
> Sent: Friday, June 08, 2001 9:56 AM
> Subject: sysconf(_SC_OPEN_MAX) limit
> > According to private communication with Chris, Cygwin has no fd limit.
> > However, we have a sysconf(_SC_OPEN_MAX) issue for Cygwin/XFree86:
> > why sysconf(_SC_OPEN_MAX) only returns 32 then. XFree86 returns errors
> > max limit is hit. One way to over come this is to hack the
> connections.c in
> > Xfree86, However, shouldn't
> > this be bumped up in the Cygwin rather than making changes in source
> > outside of
> > it. Maybe other people will come across the same problem in other
> > applications.
> > --
> > Want to unsubscribe from this list?
> > Check out: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Want to unsubscribe from this list?
Check out: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
More information about the Cygwin