long command lines (off topic by now)
Tue Jan 30 07:26:00 GMT 2001
Christopher Faylor wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 29, 2001 at 04:43:44PM -0500, Daniel Barclay wrote:
> >"Larry Hall (RFK Partners, Inc)" wrote:
> >> At 10:52 AM 1/29/2001, Daniel Barclay wrote:
> >> >...
> >> >I thought GNU software tried to avoid arbitrary limit like that. Shouldn't
> >> >the only limit be virtual memory?
> >> >
> >> I'm sure you can find your answer in the source if you're interested.
> >What's up with your attitude?
> What, specifically, are you objecting to? The suggestion that you could
> figure this out for yourself by looking at the sources?\
Yes, because this (intended behavior) is NOT something that likely can be
figured out from the sources (actual behavior).
Want to unsubscribe from this list?
Check out: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
More information about the Cygwin