would appreciate help with anon-mmap replacement
Wed Jan 10 09:10:00 GMT 2001
"Charles S. Wilson" wrote:
> Earnie -
> Apparently Zack tried to get something like this pushed into the
> kernel, but for esoteric reasons beyond my ken the fix required by gcc
> will break cygwin's fork(). That's why Zack is trying to roll his own
> for gcc; gcc doesn't use fork().
> and thread.
I'm sorry, I don't see where that message says that modifying
mmap/munmap would break fork. The reference to fork was as an example
of how it might be done. I appreciate the fact that Zack has looked at
the Cygwin source, I still say that the effort would be best spent in
the runtime, not a package workaround that may break in future runtime
Do You Yahoo!?
Talk to your friends online with Yahoo! Messenger.
Want to unsubscribe from this list?
Check out: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
More information about the Cygwin