binutils is no longer experimental
Dmitry Timoshkov
dmitry@baikal.ru
Wed Aug 8 18:38:00 GMT 2001
"Christopher Faylor" <cgf@redhat.com> wrote:
> >> >Thanks for your answer. Could you please answer one more: why binutils
> >> >provided by Cygwin distribution is so different from the ordinal one?
> >> >Is it planned to do a merge?
> >>
> >> ??? It is not "so different". There is one minor change (below) in ld.
> >>
> >> Otherwise it is straight from binutils CVS.
> >
> >Well, this command line
> >
> >diff -ur binutils-20010802-1\binutils binutils-2.11.2\binutils >binutils.diff
> >
> >gives a 328292 bytes diff. It is without comparison of other subdirectories.
> >
> >Am I doing something wrong?
>
> "CVS"
Do you mean that binutils-20010802-1 and binutils-2.11.2 were made not from CVS?
Btw the result of diffing binutils-20010425-2 and binutils-2.11.2 is much more
different.
--
Dmitry.
--
Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Bug reporting: http://cygwin.com/bugs.html
Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/
More information about the Cygwin
mailing list