libtooldl
Chris Faylor
cgf@cygnus.com
Tue Sep 19 04:25:00 GMT 2000
On Tue, Sep 19, 2000 at 07:26:05PM +1100, Robert Collins wrote:
>If I understand the dlopen issue correctly, no software that uses
>LoadLibrary() directly will work properly under cygwin due to MS wierdness?
LoadLibrary doesn't work correctly with fork(). That's it. It's not MS
weirdness, really. Microsoft surely didn't anticipate cygwin fork().
>so libtooldl (or whatever the libtool dl functions are prefixed with) won't
>work properly as they use LoadLibrary().
Sounds like it.
>I think that either LoadLibrary() should not be accessible from cygwin, or a
>wrapper should be written. (Sorry Chris, I'll just speak up and suggest
>_more_ work for you shall I?)
I'm not going to write a wrapper and I am certainly not going to eliminate
LoadLibrary().
As always, if someone else wants to do this, however, I'll gladly look into
a patch. Writing a wrapper for LoadLibrary will be pretty tricky, though.
cgf
--
Want to unsubscribe from this list?
Send a message to cygwin-unsubscribe@sourceware.cygnus.com
More information about the Cygwin
mailing list