Sun Nov 19 14:30:00 GMT 2000
On Sun, Nov 19, 2000 at 03:52:33PM -0500, Charles S. Wilson wrote:
> > (I thought all of that overly-precise specification was discarded
> > long ago since it's too cumbersome for practical use -- except of course on
> > win32...)
> yep. but we're on win32.
> > why isn't 'extern' part of the macro, btw?
> because I also had to edit the various scripts, like
> ncurses/tinfo/MKnames.awk which defines macros based on other macros:
> #define DCL(it) NCURSES_EXPORT_VAR(IT) it
ok (I recall running into that one).
> Yes, I had to munge up lots of the scripts to get things right. *That*
> is only part I'm worried about whether it still works on Linux &etc. (I
> *think* it should be okay -- since, in this context,
> Scripts affected:
well, (of course) I'm interested. It's a shame the solution has to be so
cumbersome. I've been contemplating adapting the headers in a similar
way (not so regular ;-) for symbol versioning with glibc (but won't get into
that til next month, since there's too many things that I have to do ahead
Thomas E. Dickey <firstname.lastname@example.org>
Want to unsubscribe from this list?
Send a message to email@example.com
More information about the Cygwin