binutils-20001029-1.tar.gz is missing info files
Wed Nov 15 08:16:00 GMT 2000
On Wed, Nov 15, 2000 at 10:29:03AM -0500, Jason Tishler wrote:
>Attempting to search the archives for binutils 20001029-1 and gcc
>2.95.2-3, I don't seem to find any announcements for these versions. Is
>it encouraged or discouraged to use these versions.
If setup installs it by default, it is encouraged. In fact, it's
I don't know why the info files are missing for binutils, however.
I did discuss 2.95.2-3 in this mailing list. It was the version that
DJ patched to fix the CRLF cpp problems. The lack of an announcement
for 20001019 was an oversight. I was waiting for this to propagate to
mirrors and then forgot about it.
Want to unsubscribe from this list?
Send a message to firstname.lastname@example.org
More information about the Cygwin