Cygwin performance (was [ANN] PW32 the...)
Geoffrey Noer
noer@cygnus.com
Mon Mar 13 18:08:00 GMT 2000
On Mon, Mar 13, 2000, Jeff Sturm wrote:
[...]
> Don't be so sure. I've used GCC on Interix for a while... let's just
> say that Cygwin rocks.
>
> The Interix product relies heavily on the POSIX subsystem, instead of
> shared memory as Cygwin does. For many of my user applications the
> subsystem process actually consumes more CPU time than the application!
[...]
Interesting. We have been trying to improve (and succeeding in
improving) Cygwin's runtime performance but that's been done comparing
Cygwin to Cygwin-past and not so much by doing benchmarks against
other systems I think.
Have people run any benchmarks comparing Cygwin, Uwin, NuTcracker,
Interix, anything else out there?
--
Geoffrey Noer Email: noer@cygnus.com
Cygnus Solutions, a Red Hat company http://www.redhat.com/
--
Want to unsubscribe from this list?
Send a message to cygwin-unsubscribe@sourceware.cygnus.com
More information about the Cygwin
mailing list