_argc & _argv
Paul Garceau
pgarceau@teleport.com
Wed Aug 2 12:46:00 GMT 2000
On 1 Aug 2000, at 23:09, the Illustrious Chris Faylor wrote:
> >Cygwin does try to
> stride two worlds and it is not always easy to see >the
> distinction between the Windows way and the UNIX way. In
> >retrospect, I can't honestly say that we didn't implement __argv
> and >__argc because "They don't do things that way on Windows"
> because we
^^^^^^^
> UNIX.
>
Thank you.
> >have made other concessions to the Microsoft way of doing
> >things.
I agree that the less concessions we must make to the MS way of
doing things, the better off is the outcome.
> >
> >In this case the real answer as to why there is no __argv and
> >__argc is probably "Because no one thought to add it."
I understand...
I have implemented, within my rendering app (not Cygwin) a
means to deal with argc and argv for Windows...basically I just
added the definitions under an "ifdef __CYGWIN__" Works fine
now...thanks again for everyones time on this.
Peace,
Paul G.
Nothing real can be threatened.
Nothing unreal exists.
--
Want to unsubscribe from this list?
Send a message to cygwin-unsubscribe@sourceware.cygnus.com
More information about the Cygwin
mailing list