Tue Apr 18 09:58:00 GMT 2000
Now, you've done it. It's like a virus! I tried testing your bug and now
*I* have a file called b. which I can't get rid of. Explorer compains:
Cannot delete b: Cannot find the specified file.
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Thomas.Wolff@icn.siemens.de [ mailto:Thomas.Wolff@icn.siemens.de ]
> Sent: Tuesday, April 18, 2000 11:15 AM
> To: email@example.com
> Subject: Re: 3 bugs
> On my bug report
> > My program could create a file "xy." (with a final dot) in
> the cygwin
> > environment using a link() call, but I could not manage by
> any means
> > to use, remove, or rename that file afterwards.
> there were several replies.
> : I encounter a similar problem. Apparently, files with a
> trailing "." are
> : mapped to files without any extension.
> : $ touch ab.
> : $ ls
> : ab
> : $ rm ab.
> : $ ls
> : $
> That's well-known DOS-like behaviour. Not the bug I
> described. See that
> the file created was named "ab" without a dot.
> The problem is rather the following:
> $ touch ab
> $ ln ab xy.
> $ ls
> ab xy.
> $ rm ab
> $ ls
> $ rm xy.
> rm: xy.: No such file or directory
> $ rm xy
> rm: xy: No such file or directory
> $ ls
> $ grrr
> : It sounds like this is a "feature" of the Win32 file system, in that
> : it doesn't *quite* preserve the file name correctly. If so, there's
> : not much we can do about it. Except, perhaps, to MIME encode the
> : problem file names :-(
> The issue is not one of missing filename preservation either,
> rather on
> the contrary.
> : DJ Delorie wrote:
> : > It sounds like this is a "feature" of the Win32 file
> system, in that
> : > it doesn't *quite* preserve the file name correctly. If
> so, there's
> : > not much we can do about it. Except, perhaps, to MIME encode the
> : > problem file names :-(
> : It's a "feature" of the - in this respect absolutely brain damaged -
> : NT/Win32 subsystem file naming/handling:
> : NTFS knows the difference between "xy." and "xy" , but the
> Win32 layer
> : "erases" this knowledge !
> : Getting this NTFS capability back under Win32 is not a trivial task,
> : perhaps not doable without writing a kernel subsystem .
> Don't know if that's the situation. I tried every tool I have (Norton
> commander clones etc.)
> : > Getting this NTFS capability back under Win32 is not a
> trivial task,
> : > perhaps not doable without writing a kernel subsystem .
> : > P.S.: The Interix Posix subsystem knows the difference on NTFS
> : We've talked about bypassing the win32 file system layer for other
> : things, but decided against it because it lets you create files that
> : other standard win32 programs (like explorer) can't deal with.
> Which one can?
> Thomas Wolff
> Want to unsubscribe from this list?
> Send a message to firstname.lastname@example.org
Want to unsubscribe from this list?
Send a message to email@example.com
More information about the Cygwin