yikes, what are these?

[Earnie Boyd]

--- cygwin@sourceware.cygnus.com wrote:
> If you don't like the default structure that our cygwin releases impose on
> you, there is no reason to use it.  Personally, I move everything around
> to a more "UNIX-like" structure.  So, I have a /bin, /usr/bin,
> /usr/local/bin,
> /usr/local/lib, etc.
> 
> What I'm trying to say, is that, with the possible exception of bison
> (which will be fixed in the next release) nothing should be relying
> on builtin path names using the funky H-*/i-* subdirectory structure.
> Feel free to move things into more UNIX-friendly locations.
> 
> In fact, that's what we'll be doing in the next release.

Yea!! Cheers!! ;^)

This is real good news.

Earnie.
_________________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com


--
Want to unsubscribe from this list?
Send a message to cygwin-unsubscribe@sourceware.cygnus.com