mounts, ls, and filename completion
Fri Aug 21 00:11:00 GMT 1998

In a message dated 8/20/98 4:39:47 PM Pacific Daylight Time, writes:

> How about just documenting the behavior of the mount command?

and the similarities and differences of symlink (ln -s)
I get the impression that one can't count on it working after the contains of
a symlinked file are changed.  Maybe that's why mount is recommended, but
mount is too permanent, while ln -s is too impermanent.
For help on using this list (especially unsubscribing), send a message to
"" with one line of text: "help".

More information about the Cygwin mailing list