fork + dlls

Sergey Okhapkin sos@prospect.com.ru
Fri Aug 21 00:11:00 GMT 1998


Tim Newsham wrote:
>     When you manually load a dll, and then perform a fork, the dll
> is not accessible from the child process.  When you think about what
> is going on here, it makes sense.  My question though is, is this the
> way fork should behave?  Or should (could) the fork code reload the
> dll in the child process after a fork?  It seems that this would
> more closely follow the expected fork semantics.
>

The dll will be reloaded on fork, if dll's startup code performs neccessary 
initialization. See http://www.cygnus.com/misc/gnu-win32/dl-docs.html for 
details.

--
Sergey Okhapkin, http://www.lexa.ru/sos
Moscow, Russia


-
For help on using this list (especially unsubscribing), send a message to
"gnu-win32-request@cygnus.com" with one line of text: "help".



More information about the Cygwin mailing list