Thu Apr 16 02:41:00 GMT 1998
On Tue, 14 Apr 1998, Jimen Ching wrote:
> I see many people opposing these requests, but I have yet to see a good
> reason why it shouldn't be done. Just because there are alternatives doesn't
> mean it is a bad idea. Second of all, filtering on 'Sender', 'To' and/or
> 'CC' doesn't always work because some people use aliases for the mailing
> list address. If you filter firstname.lastname@example.org, you will miss these
> messages. Adding a keyword in the subject line in all messages distributed
> by the mailing list will guarantee that the filter will trap it.
> Why is it bad to 'bung up' the subject line? What's so special about a
> subject line that you shouldn't 'bung it up'?
Because it is unnecessary! Because it makes the subject line longer making
it hard to quickly scan articles by subject -- very important for those who
get tons of messages.
As for aliases, unless someone defines global system aliases for Gnu-Win32
(can't imagine why any sysadmin will do this), it's expanded before your
MTA sends it out, so it's not an issue. I'd rather have my filtering code
miss a few (for whatever reasons) than have extra gunk added to the
I subscribe to over 20 different mailing lists, and all of these are
handled automatically via procmail-style tool (ours is a different setup,
but the idea is the same), and it all works beautifully. FYI, I've been on
this list a while, and don't remember gnu-win32 messages ending up in my
mailbox by accident w/out getting routed to the appropriate folder
For help on using this list (especially unsubscribing), send a message to
"email@example.com" with one line of text: "help".
More information about the Cygwin