What about RSXNT instead of cygwin32???
Thu Oct 16 17:16:00 GMT 1997
Peter Dalgaard BSA wrote:
> Geoffrey Noer <firstname.lastname@example.org> writes:
> > > Yes, I've tried that and it certainly seems to be a class act,
> > > although not as ambitious as cygwin32.
> > From what I have heard, RSXNT sounds like it does significantly
> > less but isn't beta quality. I've also heard that nobody is actively
> > maintaining RSXNT -- anyone know differently?
> As far as I can tell, the author is still around, but hasn't posted
> anything on the net since the summer holidays. The current version is
> from March 97, so it's not exactly rapidly changing, but it's probably
> a bit early to declare it dead.
I know from Rainer Schnitker that there will be a new version (1.4) of
RSXNT with some improvements. But 1.4 will not come this October.
For help on using this list (especially unsubscribing), send a message to
"email@example.com" with one line of text: "help".
More information about the Cygwin