1.7 - what's the right way to start X?

Fredrik Staxeng fstx+u@update.uu.se
Mon Dec 7 09:43:00 GMT 2009

"Yaakov (Cygwin/X)" <yselkowitz@users.sourceforge.net> writes:

>On 04/12/2009 10:12, Fredrik Staxeng wrote:
>> I have seen this problem before, and the solution was to run rebaseall,
>> which broke emacs, and then reinstall libncurses to fix emacs.
>> Is this the way to do it?
>> Will it still break emacs?
>> Will other things break?
>> Will it break again when updating cygwin?
>This was only true with the old version of emacs which depended on
>libncurses7, as the latter was not rebase-able.  This is no longer an
>issue with the latest version of emacs; just rebase and you should be


I just upgraded to the version released this Friday, and I haven't seen the 
message yet. But if I do, I know what to do. 

Fredrik Stax\"ang | rot13: sfgk@hcqngr.hh.fr
This is all you need to know about vi: ESC : q ! RET

Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation:         http://x.cygwin.com/docs/
FAQ:                   http://x.cygwin.com/docs/faq/

More information about the Cygwin-xfree mailing list