4.3.0 status update
Tue Jan 14 20:02:00 GMT 2003
On Tue, Jan 14, 2003 at 01:42:46 -0500, Harold L Hunt II wrote:
> No recent patches were lost. I am talking about patches that I
> submitted after the 4.2.0 branch. After about two weeks you stopped
> committing them to both trees, even though I noted that they should be
> committed to both trees. I thought I remember you telling me at one
> point that you didn't have a local 4.2.0 tree anymore... I could be
> wrong, but I got the impression that I shouldn't waste more time with
> 4.2.0 patches, so that's what I did.
Well, it doesn't take me two seconds to get another 4.2.0 tree, if you
really want stuff committing there. I have to draw the line at fixes
to the 4.2.0 branch as purely fixes for bugs though. So if there's
still something missing, let me know.
> Are you telling me instead that you will be able to apply bug fixes to a
> stable 4.3.0 tree for the life cycle of that version? That would be
> nice indeed.
Yes. But again, purely bug fixes - no features.
More information about the Cygwin-xfree