New to-do item - configuration
Thu Dec 13 07:13:00 GMT 2001
On Thu, 13 Dec 2001, Harold Hunt wrote:
> I'll tell you now that I don't really like the idea of using the XF86Config
> file, as it wasn't really suited to our needs (we don't have monitors with
> different capabilities, etc.) so I think a lot of changes will need to be
> made to the config file reader and to the list of options available. I'm
> not sure that that is the best way to approach things.
The config file reader from xfree86 is heavily integrated into the
common/xfree86 tree. They use tons of includes and I think it's more work
to get it compiling without the common/xfree86 tree than to implement a new
I'll make the config file as close as possible to XF86Config to give users
from Linux and other Unices a similar environment.
> I'm leaving this up to you, but I must say that I really prefer the registry
> approach as it is very simple. There could be a simple "configuration
> profile" mechanism where you would pass "-profile 1" or "-profile
> my_profile_name" as the only command line parameter and that would load the
> specified parameters from the registry. Just an idea...
It's as easy with config files.
And as others have stated, config files can be easily modified, removed
> Also, don't forget that command line parameters always override the
> configuration. In fact, just ignore the configuration if any command line
> parameters are specified.
I'll check what XFree86 does and use that method of discarding preset
http://www.gotti.org ICQ: 126018723
phone: +49 3725 349 80 80 mobile: +49 172 7854017
More information about the Cygwin-xfree