batting .500 on xfree86-4.0 install
Fri Oct 6 04:02:00 GMT 2000
> So, the new dll did eliminate the "back" error, but not the "Direct Draw"
> error. Somehow I think the "back" error is a red herring. Maybe I just
> have a weird video card/driver here.
WHAT NEW DLLS? PLEASE DO NOT HAVE CUSTOM VERSIONS OF FIXED/MODIFIED
AND DLLS FLOATING AROUND. YOU WILL MAKE MY LIFE HECK OF TROUBLE. I WOULD
NOT KNOW WHAT CHANGED YOU MADE, WERE THOSE CHANGES WHICH SHOULD HAVE BEEN
INCORPORATED INTO OFFICIAL RELEASES.
> Thx for your support.
> ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ Cronin
> >-----Original Message-----
> >From: email@example.com
> >[ mailto:firstname.lastname@example.org]On Behalf Of Harold Hunt
> >Sent: Thursday, October 05, 2000 10:40 PM
> >To: email@example.com
> >Subject: RE: batting .500 on xfree86-4.0 install
> >I'm sending Cronin a test dll that does not allocate a back
> >buffer for the
> >screen, because, as far as I can tell, the back buffer is not needed.
More information about the Cygwin-xfree