cygcheck's understanding of TZ

Christopher Faylor
Thu Jun 16 23:46:00 GMT 2011

On Thu, Jun 16, 2011 at 06:03:57PM -0400, Buchbinder, Barry (NIH/NIAID) [E] wrote:
>Christopher Faylor wrote on Tuesday, June 14, 2011 3:22 PM
>> Ok.  We're now inexplicably looping back to the beginning
>> of the discussion.  Please consider this thread officially
>> terminated.
>So cygwin-talk is appropriate?
>What about giving both?  People could choose what they want or need.
>Might one just add something like line from
>printf ("Current System Time (UTC): %s\n", asctime (gmtime (&now)));
>Not that I care, but the OP seems to.

Still looping:

The OP may care but he hasn't explained why he cares.  Without an
explanation, I see no reason to pursue a patch to make things work
better for him.

Please give this a rest.


More information about the Cygwin-talk mailing list