Fri Jul 17 00:43:00 GMT 2009
Christopher Faylor wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 16, 2009 at 12:28:31PM +0100, Dave Korn wrote:
>> Dave Korn wrote:
>> Bah, wrong list, sorry.
> It really is ok to be humorous in the Cygwin list.
I know, but I wouldn't have bothered with a silly "To:" line if I had meant
to send it there!
> Or do I mean contemptuously sarcastic? Hmm. Come to think of it there
> obviously is no difference.
Say, is that commutative? I just wondered which would be worse:
contemptuous sarcasm, or sarcastic contempt.
Oh wait! I could be facetious too!
More information about the Cygwin-talk