Strange things with cygdrive
Tue Jul 22 11:34:00 GMT 2008
On Tue, July 22, 2008 4:10 am, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
> On Jul 22 12:23, Angelo Graziosi wrote:
>> Corinna Vinschen wrote:
>>> No, it's ok for the cygdrive prefix in 1.5.x
>> Oh thanks having reassured me. But is there some tricks to change that
>> user(0) and (horrible) date (01.01.1970)?
> No. It will look somewhat different in 1.7, but the date is a fixed
> date nevertheless.
Fixed? Nay, one almost might say, "epochal".
More information about the Cygwin-talk