chmod permission denied on windows 2008
Fri Jul 4 18:12:00 GMT 2008
Gary R. Van Sickle wrote on 04 July 2008 18:46:
>> From: Dave Korn
>> Sent: Friday, July 04, 2008 12:35 PM
>> To: Thread TITTTL'd!
>> Subject: FW: chmod permission denied on windows 2008
>> Gary R. Van Sickle wrote on 04 July 2008 17:42:
>>>> From: Christopher Faylor
>>>> On Thu, Jul 03, 2008 at 11:22:03PM +0100, Steven Hartland wrote:
>>>>> Hope this gets through the lists broken spam detection, and helps id
>>>>> the issue.
>>>> How to Win Friends and Influence People...
>>> Please take such Cygwin-content-free snarking to the appropriate list
>> Funny that you should see snarking about "broken spam
>> detection" as Cygwin-content-related and it's only the reply that you
>> thought off-topic. It does give you the appearance of operating a
> The OP's post did not consist solely of snarking about "broken spam
Ah, you are trying to establish that you operate a consistent standard.
Good, but I'm not sure you are correct.
In the past, other people have also made solely snarking posts which you
have not complained about. Likewise and by contrast, others have in the
past made posts that, while snarky, were not solely snarky, and which you
have complained about.
Therefore I don't think that's really the full and sole criterion you're
really applying. I think you apply different criteria depending on the OP's
Can't think of a witty .sigline today....
More information about the Cygwin-talk