FW: Probllem with New GDB/Eclipse
Dave Korn
dave.korn@artimi.com
Tue Feb 13 16:25:00 GMT 2007
On 12 February 2007 12:14, Christopher Faylor wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 12, 2007 at 06:53:35AM +0000, Charles Tubbs wrote:
>> Brian Dessent <brian <at> dessent.net> writes:
>>> Doyle Rhynard wrote:
>>>> When others depend upon what you do, the old maximum for physicians
>>>> should apply also: "First, do no harm". My suggestion is to roll back
>>>
>>> That logic would only apply if the Eclipse module was an actual Cygwin
>>> package, but it's not. Fixing packages of 3PPs is not our job, it's
>>> theirs.
>>
>> Obviously the CDT developers erred by choosing to use a well defined
>> package that inexplicably changes in the undefined areas. You are a
>> very good advertisement for Visual Studio.
>
> You do realize that this thread is more than six months old, right?
>
> cgf
Not to mention entirely based on the false premise that cygwin had suddenly
removed support for dos-style paths!
cheers,
DaveK
--
Can't think of a witty .sigline today....
More information about the Cygwin-talk
mailing list