FW: Probllem with New GDB/Eclipse

Dave Korn dave.korn@artimi.com
Tue Feb 13 16:25:00 GMT 2007


On 12 February 2007 12:14, Christopher Faylor wrote:

> On Mon, Feb 12, 2007 at 06:53:35AM +0000, Charles Tubbs wrote:
>> Brian Dessent <brian <at> dessent.net> writes:
>>> Doyle Rhynard wrote:
>>>> When others depend upon what you do, the old maximum for physicians
>>>> should apply also: "First, do no harm".  My suggestion is to roll back
>>> 
>>> That logic would only apply if the Eclipse module was an actual Cygwin
>>> package, but it's not.  Fixing packages of 3PPs is not our job, it's
>>> theirs.
>> 
>> Obviously the CDT developers erred by choosing to use a well defined
>> package that inexplicably changes in the undefined areas.  You are a
>> very good advertisement for Visual Studio.
> 
> You do realize that this thread is more than six months old, right?
> 
> cgf


  Not to mention entirely based on the false premise that cygwin had suddenly
removed support for dos-style paths!


    cheers,
      DaveK
-- 
Can't think of a witty .sigline today....



More information about the Cygwin-talk mailing list