change in behavior of make from 3.80 to 3.81

[mwoehlke]

Christopher Faylor wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 16, 2006 at 01:20:55PM -0500, mwoehlke wrote:
>> Christopher Faylor wrote:
>>> On Wed, Aug 16, 2006 at 01:44:06PM -0400, Bob Rossi wrote:
>>>> I think your solution is well stated.  Does anyone know who was
>>>> maintaining the old patch to make, so that a discussion with that
>>>> person could be made more substantial on a technical level?
>>> And ^^^this^^^ is a perfect example of why this discussion is so
>>> frustrating.
>>>
>>> Does someone *really* have to tell you who was "maintaining the old
>>> patch"?  If you really need to be told this then you really don't have
>>> the right to an opinion on this subject at all since you clearly haven't
>>> been paying any attention.
>> I think someone needs to read http://isbn.nu/0671723650
>> ...I'm sure something about "paying attention" is mentioned. :-D
>>
>> (Sorry, I just COULDN'T resist :-D.)
> 
> Hey, for a second, I thought this was directed towards me (since I am
> just counting the seconds until that happens) but I actually think this
> was directed to my good friend Bob, right?
> 
> Or am *I* missing something obvious?  I would almost prefer it if I was.
> The alternative is just too mind-bogglingly >deleted<.

Yup, at Bob. DEFINITELY at Bob. I almost re-posted (and I don't mean on 
-talk) when I saw his reply to your message. :-)

Now I wonder what that was that you deleted...

-- 
Matthew
vIMprove your life! Now on version 7!