sending an empty UDP packet.
Corinna Vinschen
corinna-cygwin@cygwin.com
Fri Jun 30 13:34:00 GMT 2006
On Jun 30 14:27, Dave Korn wrote:
> On 30 June 2006 12:09, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
>
> > On Jun 30 19:18, Tanaka Akira wrote:
> >> Hi. I have a trouble to send an empty UDP packet.
> >
> > Thanks for the bug report and especially the testcase. It's incredible
> > but the check for a zero length packet has been introduced in 2002, 4
> > years ago, and nobody has ever complained that it's wrong. Wow. Almost
> > embarrassing.
> >
> > I've fixed that in current CVS. Check the next snapshot from
> > http://cygwin.com/snapshots or wait for 1.5.20, which is really
> > due soon now.
>
> Sending no data with unreliable delivery (of that no data) is a bit too zen
> for most, I guess ...
Agreed. I'm still scratching my head what sending an empty UDP packet
is good for, but it's perfectly valid.
Corinna
More information about the Cygwin-talk
mailing list