mismatched dll

Yitzchak Scott-Thoennes sthoenna@efn.org
Fri Feb 3 03:35:00 GMT 2006


On Thu, Feb 02, 2006 at 08:43:52PM -0500, Bob Rossi wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 02, 2006 at 08:38:42PM -0500, Christopher Faylor wrote:
> > On Thu, Feb 02, 2006 at 08:37:12PM -0500, Bob Rossi wrote:
> > >On Thu, Feb 02, 2006 at 09:58:17PM +0000, Eric Blake wrote:
> > >>There's always another alternative - propose to maintain your package
> > >>as part of the official cygwin distribution.  Then you just point
> > >>people to cygwin.com, and source code distribution becomes cygwin.com's
> > >>problem instead of yours.
> > >
> > >OK, here I do have some evidence to support me when I say you are
> > >partially wrong.
> > >http://www.cygwin.com/ml/cygwin-apps/2003-08/msg00064.html So, that is
> > >not a good alternative.
> > 
> > I retract my veto.  If this is submitted via normal channels, I will have
> > no objections.
> 
> Well, I suppose
> 
>     "anything in computer science is [possible], if you are willing to write 
>     the code and wait long enough"?

We clearly have someone here who has caught on to the spirit of cygwin.



More information about the Cygwin-talk mailing list