Add requirement for SYSTEMROOT to FAQ?

Christopher Faylor cgf-no-personal-reply-please@cygwin.com
Fri Oct 8 17:10:00 GMT 2004


On Fri, Oct 08, 2004 at 12:57:20PM -0400, Igor Pechtchanski wrote:
>On Fri, 8 Oct 2004, Christopher Faylor wrote:
>
>> On Fri, Oct 08, 2004 at 03:21:18PM +0100, Dave Korn wrote:
>> >> -----Original Message-----
>> >> From: cygwin-owner On Behalf Of Christopher Faylor
>> >> Sent: 08 October 2004 15:14
>> >
>> >> On Fri, Oct 08, 2004 at 10:30:22AM +0100, Dave Korn wrote:
>> >> >> -----Original Message-----
>> >> >> From: cygwin-owner On Behalf Of David A. Rogers
>> >> >> Sent: 07 October 2004 22:08
>> >> >>
>> >>>>In any case, I don't think an attempt to be helpful warrents a snippy
>> >>>>response.
>> >>>
>> >>>LOL, new round here are you?  http://cygwin.com/acronyms#WJM !
>> >>
>> >>Yeah, I'm just mean, even when I'm not mean, since simple declarations
>> >>of fact are taken as "snippy".
>> >
>> >YJS!
>> >
>> >I didn't think your comment was snippy, I was just introducing a
>> >newcomer to the list's sense of humour.
>>
>> There were three messages in the cygwin list which addressed my
>> "snippiness" (thanks, Larry, btw).  Don't I get to set the record
>> straight and introduce a new, useful acronym in the process?
>
>Sure you do.  However, I'll let you use the acronym for a bit without
>putting it in the OLOCA (while I'm away for the weekend).  It'll make for
>a lot of interesting interpretations of the trailing "S"... ];->

Or even the middle "J".

cgf



More information about the Cygwin-talk mailing list