[PATCH v2] update Cygwin-X news page X.Org and Cygwin release announcements to current stable releases
Jon Turney
jon.turney@dronecode.org.uk
Sat Feb 1 15:52:14 GMT 2025
On 31/01/2025 03:39, Brian Inglis wrote:
> might want to change the older messages to a more general Cygwin-X FAQ reference
I don't really understand how this statement applies to the change
suggested?
>
> Signed-off-by: Brian Inglis <Brian.Inglis@SystematicSW.ab.ca>
> ---
> xfree/cygx-news-new.html | 18 +++++++++---------
> 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/xfree/cygx-news-new.html b/xfree/cygx-news-new.html
> index e326fa084c2c..a9ff136ea684 100644
> --- a/xfree/cygx-news-new.html
> +++ b/xfree/cygx-news-new.html
> @@ -1,14 +1,14 @@
> <p>
> -<a href="https://lists.x.org/archives/xorg-announce/2021-October/003115.html">
> -X server 21.1</a> and
Thanks, but:
This is deliberately the major release number.
> -<a href="http://lists.x.org/archives/xorg-announce/2012-June/001977.html">
> -X.Org X11 Release 7.7</a>
> +<a href="https://lists.x.org/archives/xorg-announce/2024-December/003576.html">
> +X.Org X Server 21.1.15</a> and
> +<a href="https://lists.x.org/archives/xorg-announce/2024-July/003521.html">
> +X.Org X11 Release 1.8.10</a>
This is wrong.
R7.7 is the X11 rollup release number (informally called a "katamari"),
inherited from the days when X11 was distributed as a monolithic source
tree.
This is not the libX11 version number.
> are included in Cygwin.
> -Details are available in the announcements
> -<a href="https://cygwin.com/pipermail/cygwin-announce/2021-November/010286.html">
> -here</a> and
> -<a href="http://cygwin.com/ml/cygwin-xfree-announce/2012-07/msg00001.html">
> -here</a>.
> +Details are available in the announcements of the respective Cygwin packages
> +<a href="https://cygwin.com/pipermail/cygwin-announce/2025-January/012120.html">
> +X.Org Server 21.1.15</a> and
> +<a href="https://cygwin.com/pipermail/cygwin-announce/2025-January/012082.html">
> +X.Org X11 refresh</a>.
> </p>
If I was going to change this, I'd probably just remove it all, since
X11 development velocity is slow enough these days that it doesn't
really communicate much useful information.
More information about the Cygwin-patches
mailing list