[PATCH] Cygwin: pipe: Give up to use query_hdl for non-cygwin apps.
Takashi Yano
takashi.yano@nifty.ne.jp
Tue Mar 5 14:47:53 GMT 2024
On Tue, 5 Mar 2024 11:14:46 +0100
Corinna Vinschen wrote:
> On Mar 5 09:06, Takashi Yano wrote:
> > On Mon, 4 Mar 2024 18:38:07 +0100
> > Corinna Vinschen wrote:
> > > On Mar 4 16:45, ASSI wrote:
> > > > Corinna Vinschen writes:
> > > > > Right you are. We always said that independent Cygwin installations
> > > > > are supposed to *stay* independent.
> > > > >
> > > > > Keep in mind that they don't share the same shared objects in the native
> > > > > NT namespace and they don't know of each other. It's not only the
> > > > > process table but also in-use FIFO stuff, pty info, etc.
> > > >
> > > > What I was getting at is that a process not showing up in the process
> > > > list in one Cygwin installation doesn't automatically mean it's a native
> > > > Windows process, it could be a process started by an independent Cygwin
> > > > installation. So this way of checking for "native" Windows processes
> > > > may or may not do what was originally intended.
> > >
> > > But that was my point. A "foreign" Cygwin process from another
> > > installation is not a Cygwin process. Lots of interoperability
> > > just won't work, so it's basically a native process.
> >
> > Actually, I think query_hdl can be retrieved from the process
> > from another installation of cygwin using NtQueryInformationProcess()
> > with ProcessHandleInformation. However, I cannot imagne the case
> > that the pipe is made by one cygwin installation but the reader
> > process is from another installation of cygwin.
> >
> > BTW, what about v2 patch itself?
>
> It does the job with less code and less memory, which is good.
> I would change the comment
>
> stop to try to get query_hdl for non-cygwin apps
>
> to something like
>
> don't try to fetch query_hdl from non-cygwin apps
>
> "stop trying" is a bit of a back-reference to the old code, which
> is not necessary, I think.
I'll submit v3 patch. Please review.
> This doesn't affect your patch, but while looking into this, what
> strikes me as weird is that fhandler_pipe::temporary_query_hdl() calls
> NtQueryObject() and assembles the pipe name via swscanf() every time it
> is called.
>
> Wouldn't it make sense to store the name in the fhandler's
> path_conv::wide_path/uni_path at creation time instead?
> The wide_path member is not used at all in pipes, ostensibly.
Is the patch attached as you intended?
--
Takashi Yano <takashi.yano@nifty.ne.jp>
-------------- next part --------------
An embedded and charset-unspecified text was scrubbed...
Name: 0001-Cygwin-pipe-Simplify-chhecking-procedure-of-query_hd.patch
URL: <https://cygwin.com/pipermail/cygwin-patches/attachments/20240305/1b811f4a/attachment.ksh>
More information about the Cygwin-patches
mailing list