[PATCH] Hide sethostname() in unistd.h
Christian Franke
Christian.Franke@t-online.de
Fri Jun 19 05:28:00 GMT 2015
Corinna Vinschen wrote:
> On Jun 17 15:15, Eric Blake wrote:
>> On 06/17/2015 02:57 PM, Yaakov Selkowitz wrote:
>>> On Wed, 2015-06-17 at 22:25 +0200, Christian Franke wrote:
>>>> Busybox does not use autoconf or similar. It requires manual platform
>>>> specific configuration which does not yet support a missing
>>>> sethostname(). After adding HAVE_SETHOSTNAME manually and some other
>>>> minor additions, busybox (which many commands enabled) compiles and
>>>> works reasonably.
>>>> Would ITP make sense ?
>>> TBH I'm not sure. Presuming you're discussing the single-executable
>>> build (so as not to clobber coreutils etc.), there is still the question
>>> of (not) matching the heavily-patched coreutils wrt .exe handling etc.
>>> What do you think the use case would be?
>> Portability testing is one thing - I often compare how
>> bash/dash/zsh/mksh handle a shell construct, and adding busybox sh into
>> the mix adds another perspective. But yeah, I don't see busybox
>> becoming the default source of these apps, so much as an alternative
>> implementation.
> If it's called "busybox" and the package doesn't try to create shortcuts
> /bin/sh -> /bin/busybox, etc, I don't see a problem to ITP it.
Symlinks in standard places should not be created, of course.
The shell and other commands could still be started by: busybox COMMAND ..."
> If those symlinks are required for busybox to work, they should be
> encapsulated in their own subdir, something like /usr/libexec/busybox
> or so. Users just need to set $PATH correctly then. Or maybe that
> could be done by busybox as well.
Yes: busybox --install -s /some/where
Busybox may occasionally be useful because it provides lightweight
versions of various commands (including daemons) not part of the Cygwin
base installation and a few commands not available in any package.
It could also be used to build a minimalistic Cygwin (busybox.exe,
mintty.exe, cygwin1.dll). If build with standalone option enabled,
symlinks are not needed then.
Christian
More information about the Cygwin-patches
mailing list