Building for nocygwin
Mon Apr 23 20:06:00 GMT 2012
On Mon, Apr 23, 2012 at 02:35:16PM -0500, Yaakov (Cygwin/X) wrote:
>On 2012-04-23 10:37, Christopher Faylor wrote:
>> On Mon, Apr 23, 2012 at 04:52:54PM +0200, Michel Bardiaux wrote:
>>> I *get* that. My problem was, the web is so cluttered with pages mentioning
>>> the no-cygwin thing (including the cygwin FAQ!) that finding a good howto is
>>> nearly impossible.
>>> Is there a deep reason not to amend the FAQ?
>> No, there is no reason not to change the FAQ.
>> Could someone provide some appropriate words?
Thanks very much. Please check in (with typo correction mentioned in
I suspect that we'll probably need to flesh this out over time but at
least we aren't suggesting the use of a deprecated compiler option now.
More information about the Cygwin-patches