Building for nocygwin
Mon Apr 23 19:35:00 GMT 2012
On 2012-04-23 10:37, Christopher Faylor wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 23, 2012 at 04:52:54PM +0200, Michel Bardiaux wrote:
>> I *get* that. My problem was, the web is so cluttered with pages mentioning
>> the no-cygwin thing (including the cygwin FAQ!) that finding a good howto is
>> nearly impossible.
>> Is there a deep reason not to amend the FAQ?
> No, there is no reason not to change the FAQ.
> Could someone provide some appropriate words?
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Size: 3653 bytes
Desc: not available
More information about the Cygwin-patches