provide __xpg_strerror_r

[Corinna Vinschen]

On Feb  9 21:15, Christopher Faylor wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 09, 2011 at 05:20:59PM -0700, Eric Blake wrote:
> >+/* Newlib's <string.h> provides declarations for two strerror_r
> >+   variants, according to preprocessor feature macros.  It does the
> >+   right thing for GNU strerror_r, but its __xpg_strerror_r mishandles
> >+   a case of EINVAL when coupled with our strerror() override.*/
> > #if 0
> 
> Can't we get rid of this now?

I agree.  We should simply implement strerror_r by ourselves, even if
it's identical to newlib's strerror_r.  In the long run it's less
puzzeling to have all the strerror variants in one place.


Corinna

-- 
Corinna Vinschen                  Please, send mails regarding Cygwin to
Cygwin Project Co-Leader          cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Red Hat